On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 Nov 2008, at 16:31, Alex Smith wrote: > >> I intend to appeal this with 2 support. Increasing a player's voting >> limit on a decision causes it to be higher than it otherwise would have >> been. Eir voting limit was 1, increased by 50 (or however many it was, I >> can't remember offhand). > > I support.
I also support. The judgement of these CFJs should at least have addressed this line of argument. Pavitra
