On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes it does. Before one of the cases is appealed, an outside case > that says "A is the judge of case X" can't be judged true (for it > implies e isn't) and can't be judged false (for it implies e is).
No, it doesn't. If the outside case is judged true, it implies that A is the judge of X, and therefore A judged X incorrectly while B judged it correctly (but invalidly). A might later be vindicated by further debate of the subject, but there's no reason at that point in time to assume that the judge of the outside case is wrong no matter what eir judgement actually is. -root
