On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The paradox was the question of "who judged CFJ 1594". This was before >> judgement-questions were specifically excluded from paradox. -Goethe > > I realize that. The fact that you consulted two potential oracles and > both said "I'm not the oracle; ask the other guy" doesn't make the > question "who is the oracle" paradoxical. It just means that the > oracle was lying to you, and that those answers alone aren't going to > be sufficient to resolve the question.
Yes it does. Before one of the cases is appealed, an outside case that says "A is the judge of case X" can't be judged true (for it implies e isn't) and can't be judged false (for it implies e is). -Goethe
