On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you re-post the agreement so I can read it over? (Somwhere I lost
> which was the final copy)
>
> BobTHJ

Here you go:

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following:
>
> {The name of this contract is "The Llama Party." This is a public
> contract. Parties to this contract are known as Llamas. Contract
> Changes can be performed with the consent of a majority of Llamas;
> this is the only way a person can join this contract. Any Llama can
> cause any Llama who is not an active player to cease to be a Llama.
> Any Llama CAN leave this contract by announcement.
>
> A valid vote cast by a Llama of LLAMA (X), where X resolves to FOR or
> AGAINST, is a party vote toward FOR or AGAINST, respectively. A party
> vote endorses the party decision, or resolves to X if there is no
> party decision. The party decision is based on the ratio of party
> votes toward FOR to party votes toward AGAINST: if this ratio is
> greater than the Agoran decision's adoption index, the party decision
> is FOR, and if the ratio is less, the party decision is AGAINST.
>
> On an Agoran decision with an adoption index, Llamas SHALL NOT cast a
> vote other than LLAMA (X) for some X. The Llamas SHOULD determine what
> the party decision is if the Assessor requests them to do so.}

--Ivan Hope CXXVII

Reply via email to