On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 16:54, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 16:31, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:30 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> {The name of this contract is "The Llama Party." This is a public
>>>> contract. Parties to this contract are known as Llamas. Any person CAN
>>>> join this contract with the consent of a majority of Llamas. Any Llama
>>>> CAN leave this contract by announcement.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Let's replace "Any person CAN join this contract with the consent
>>> of a majority of Llamas." with "Contract Changes can be performed with
>>> the consent of a majority of Llamas; this is the only way a person can
>>> join this contract."
>>
>> You probably want a means to shed inactive Llamas (Any Llama CAN cause
>> a Llama to cease to be a party to this contract without Objection of
>> any other Llama).
>
> That's a Contract Change, so it can be performed with the consent of a
> majority of Llamas.It's difficult to get that consent if a majority of Llamas have become inactive. -woggle
