On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ivan Hope wrote: >> A valid vote cast by a Llama of LLAMA (X), where X resolves to FOR or >> AGAINST, is a party vote toward FOR or AGAINST, respectively. A party > > "is a party vote toward X"
Is that better beyond being a bit shorter? That would make it so that party votes can be toward conditional votes rather than FOR or AGAINST, which breaks things later on. >> vote endorses the party decision, or resolves to X if there is no > > "resolves to the party decision" Replacing "endorses" with "resolves" would make the terminology a bit nicer, yes. By the way, I also invite ais523 and Sgeo into the party. Surprising, ain't it. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
