On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree to the following: > > {The name of this contract is "The Llama Party.
Ah! Using the conditional vote mechanism is a lot better than the complicated mechanisms I had envisioned for this requiring explicit voting. > This is a public > contract. Who are the parties to this contract? > Contract > Changes can be performed with the consent of a majority of Llamas; > this is the only way a person can join this contract. Can I join?