On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 6:39 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree to the following:
>
> {The name of this contract is "The Llama Party.

Ah!  Using the conditional vote mechanism is a lot better than the
complicated mechanisms I had envisioned for this requiring explicit
voting.

> This is a public
> contract.

Who are the parties to this contract?

> Contract
> Changes can be performed with the consent of a majority of Llamas;
> this is the only way a person can join this contract.

Can I join?

Reply via email to