ihope wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ivan Hope wrote: >>> A valid vote cast by a Llama of LLAMA (X), where X resolves to FOR or >>> AGAINST, is a party vote toward FOR or AGAINST, respectively. A party >> "is a party vote toward X" > > Is that better beyond being a bit shorter? That would make it so that > party votes can be toward conditional votes rather than FOR or > AGAINST, which breaks things later on.
Oh, I missed that X could itself be conditional.
