On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 16:54, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> You probably want a means to shed inactive Llamas (Any Llama CAN cause >>> a Llama to cease to be a party to this contract without Objection of >>> any other Llama). >> >> That's a Contract Change, so it can be performed with the consent of a >> majority of Llamas. > > It's difficult to get that consent if a majority of Llamas have become > inactive.
I guess we can say "Any Llama can cause any Llama who is not an active player to become inactive." right at the end of the last paragraph. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
