On Sunday 23 December 2007 09:24:27 comex wrote: > On Dec 23, 2007 1:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Arguments: comex has stated specifically in the past that e does not > > believe that e has huge numbers of ordinary votes, nor would any reasonable > > person. So e has made a false representation of eir voting power with > > a demonstrated lack of belief in eir truthfulness on the matter. If > > found guilty, I request that eir repeat offenses and lack of respect > > for recordkeepors in light of eir own laziness in looking up records > > be brought into account during sentencing. > > If I'm not mistaken, there is an ambiguity in whether or not pikhq > won; therefore my VLOP could be either four or seven. In light of > this ambiguity, I thought it most appropriate to overvote; admittedly > I could have included an explicit disclaimer. >
I would've just voted what you would be able to if I hadn't won, and perhaps a disclaimer attached. Disclaimer: my votes of FORx8 were only valid if I didn't win; otherwise, it was only FORx4.
