On Dec 23, 2007 1:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arguments: comex has stated specifically in the past that e does not > believe that e has huge numbers of ordinary votes, nor would any reasonable > person. So e has made a false representation of eir voting power with > a demonstrated lack of belief in eir truthfulness on the matter. If > found guilty, I request that eir repeat offenses and lack of respect > for recordkeepors in light of eir own laziness in looking up records > be brought into account during sentencing.
If I'm not mistaken, there is an ambiguity in whether or not pikhq won; therefore my VLOP could be either four or seven. In light of this ambiguity, I thought it most appropriate to overvote; admittedly I could have included an explicit disclaimer.
