On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Zefram wrote: > In the present case, we have the voting period on proposals. There's > nothing in CFJ 1434 to support the holiday rule altering voting periods > that end within a holiday.
Balderdash. This depends on your reading of what "required" applies to. "Required to vote in order to be counted" or "assessor required to count votes that apply" are both reasonable interpretations of the phrase which could de-facto extend the voting period. -Goethe
