On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Taral wrote: > On 12/22/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Of course e should. It's still misrepresentation. What about any/every >> player who tries to keep some kind of reasonable tally on how voting is >> going? Should they be constantly required to check against the report in >> light of obvious falsehoods? -Goethe > > That's a slightly different argument, though.
Fair enough, I take your point... anyway that argument applies to sentencing, not guilt, so maybe not that important at the moment. -Goethe