On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Taral wrote:
> On 12/22/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Of course e should.  It's still misrepresentation.  What about any/every
>> player who tries to keep some kind of reasonable tally on how voting is
>> going?  Should they be constantly required to check against the report in
>> light of obvious falsehoods?  -Goethe
>
> That's a slightly different argument, though.

Fair enough, I take your point... anyway that argument applies to sentencing,
not guilt, so maybe not that important at the moment.  -Goethe



Reply via email to