On 12/18/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 2:35 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At the time Fookiemyartug registered I was the only partner. comex
> > retroactively became a partner during my nkep scam, but prior to that
> > point Fookiemyartug has a basis of only me. I have been meaning to
> > expose this for some time to test its legality but never got around to
> > it. I had hoped someone would call me on it so I could retroactively
> > add a second partner to the agreement and legalize it before a CFJ
> > could be resolved.
>
> Contracts are between two or more players, so if you were the only
> partner, then in fact you weren't a partner at all because it didn't
> exist.  Fookiemyartug thus did not come into existence until comex
> joined it.  Therefore by clause 7, comex "retroactively" joined it at
> the same moment that e actually joined it, and the contract did come
> into existence retroactively.  So I feel safe in asserting that
> Fookiemyartug is not now and never has been a player.
>
> -root
>
Here's the relevant clause from the Fookiemyartug contract:
{
7. A person may become party to this agreement with the consent of the
partner known as BobTHJ. Becoming a party to this agreement
retroactively causes that person to be a party to this agreement since
its inception.
}

And the relevant bit of R1742
{
Any group of two or more persons may make an agreement among
      themselves with the intention that it be binding upon them and
      be governed by the rules.  Such an agreement is known as a
      contract.
}

I would argue that the inception of the agreement occurred shortly
before Fookiemyartug's registration. comex's joining it turned it into
an agoran-recognized contract, but R1742 does not prohibit agreements
between one person. Contracts are a subset of agreements made between
two or more people that are both binding and governed by the rules.

BobTHJ

Reply via email to