On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Roger Hicks wrote: > > At the time Fookiemyartug registered I was the only partner. comex > > retroactively became a partner during my nkep scam, but prior to that > > point Fookiemyartug has a basis of only me. > > Heh. Fookie is what inspired the list of proposed restrictions I just > sent. > > This is as bad a crime as Annabel, IMO. I suggest looking back at all > statements made by BobTHJ for truthfulness (obviously, every vote made > by Fookie was made with knowing misrepresentation on BobTHJ's part), > with a separate criminal trial for each statement and expulsion on the > table (no worse than was suggested for Maud at the time).
Actually I think it's established that purporting to perform a game action on behalf of an entity is not equivalent to stating that it is allowed to perform that action. e.g. I can vote x1048576 without being subject to a criminal trial.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
