On 12/18/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 2:48 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is as bad a crime as Annabel, IMO. I suggest looking back at all > > statements made by BobTHJ for truthfulness (obviously, every vote made > > by Fookie was made with knowing misrepresentation on BobTHJ's part), with > > a separate criminal trial for each statement and expulsion on the table > > (no worse than was suggested for Maud at the time). > > Fookiemyartug has never voted. In fact, I don't think it's ever > performed any action at all. > > -root > Fookiemyartug has never has a positive voting limit. It may have initiated a CFJ or an Agoran Decision or two and perhaps supported or objected to something (if it is even legal for partnerships to do so, which I don't think it is). I was careful to ensure my statements regarding Fookiemyartug were in truthful (at least I believed them to be). Also, with the retroactive clause in Fookiemyartug's contract, and no rule against retroactivity, then once comex joined what made it illegal?
BobTHJ
