On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > These appear to be compatible with and serving different purposes from > what I proposed. If 1. is adopted, I would still advocate using > "SHALL NOT" rather than "CANNOT" in Limited Partnerships, since the > Notary's basis information is not necessarily correct.
Making it illegal but possible, with the only punishment being exile for the partnership (rather than punishment for members of the basis) means that I can register a partnership, vote with it, etc., and the worst that happens if I'm found out is that my partnership goes away (but the votes still count, etc.). May want to make the basis bear responsibility, too. -Goethe