if I hop on 23 and stop at the flashing light I'm in hammettland?

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025, 4:20 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> *nods* The number of people who wanted a four-way stop at that
> intersection was insane. I think the state put the flashing lights on 23,
> which doesn't stop, as opposed to Perry, which is required to stop. I
> haven't driven through there lately, but that's what I remember of the
> planning document I saw.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Hohhof" <khoh...@kwom.com>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 4:08:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BEAD
>
> In fairness, the state takes 4-5 months (or more) to do everything.
> Like the flashing lights at a dangerous intersection just down the road
> from you.
> Of course, the flashing lights probably won't do anything to stop people
> from blowing through the stop sign because they're texting.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2025 4:02 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BEAD
>
> "it’s the permitting, engineering, fees to every government entity,
> paperwork, etc. that you have to pay."
>
> We don't have any permitting or government fees. That's actually
> prohibited by state regulation.
> I haven't found the engineering to be that expensive either, even if
> contracted out.
> I have found the permitting delays to be a bitch, though. We're like four
> or five months waiting on the state to get back to us on a permit. The
> cities are down to about a 1 - 2 week turnaround.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Radabaugh" <m...@amplex.net>
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 6:53:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BEAD
>
> The extra fiber needed to do AE isn’t a big deal when you are building
> centralized split architecture in mid to dense population areas, but it
> becomes pretty cost prohibitive quickly in low density and with NG2-PON on
> the horizon with the capability of delivering 10G/10G over a 40G capacity
> PON I don’t see much need for AE anytime soon.
>
> Why is is so expensive?   Fiber isn’t expensive - it’s the permitting,
> engineering, fees to every government entity, paperwork, etc. that you have
> to pay.
>
> Mark
>
> > On Mar 21, 2025, at 4:49 PM, dbernardi <dberna...@zitomedia.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > But the expensive/important part (fiber) is in place.  If the gubment is
> going to piss away tax dollars for unserved/underserved broadband, fiber
> construction seems like a decent urinal.
> >
> > XGS-PON can co-exist with GPON on the same fiber so eventual upgrades
> are fairly easy.  Do combo GPON/XGS-PON at the OLT out of the gate so a CPE
> swap is the only thing require for an upgrade to a shared 10Gb service.
>  When XGS-PON isn't enough bandwidth for the 32 subscribers on a PON, I'd
> rather replace equipment at either end than deal with another construction
> project.  Or do a 1:16 split.
> >
> > Preparing for AE when doing the construction is probably worthwhile too
> even if you only light for PON initially, or mix/match.  The cost of
> deploying high count fiber cable isn't that significant in the big picture.
> >
> > And why does fiber construction have to be so (artificially?)
> expensive.  Buy America will certainly make broadband deployments more
> expensive but that's a good thing if it truly provides jobs and
> manufacturing investment, but I have my doubts.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/21/2025 2:04 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> >> Is GPON good enough?  That can only do gigabit and each port is 2.5G.
> Should these projects require NGPON?  Or maybe every location should have
> AE so they can do 100G to start with.
> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 2:01 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
> <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>    Because in X years they won't be. With fiber they will be upon the
> >>    same Infrastructure.
> >>    On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 10:59 AM Josh Luthman
> >>    <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
> >>    wrote:
> >>        But people that currently have fixed wireless of 100x20 are
> >>        sufficiently served?  How does that make any sense?
> >>        On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:44 AM Steve Jones
> >>        <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
> >>        wrote:
> >>            they should not allow fixed wireless, they never should have
> >>            allowed technology with a short shelf life
> >>            On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:17 AM Adam Moffett
> >>            <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>                Well....
> >>                https://bsky.app/profile/craigsilverman.bsky.social/
> >>                post/3lkiye5n2dk2p <https://bsky.app/profile/
> >>                craigsilverman.bsky.social/post/3lkiye5n2dk2p>
> >>                https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/seq3uoU1L5
> >>                <https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/seq3uoU1L5>
> >>                The director of BEAD quit.  He says the previous rules
> >>                interpreted the bill to mean that only FTTH would meet
> >>                the performance and future-proofing requirements.  He is
> >>                claiming that there are proposed rule changes that will
> >>                allow Starlink but not allow fixed wireless.  I don't
> >>                know whether the changes /intentionally/ benefit
> >>                Starlink, but this guy is crying foul and felt strongly
> >>                enough about it to resign over it.
> >>                -Adam
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>                *From:* AF on behalf of Ken Hohhof
> >>                *Sent:* Thursday, March 20, 2025 12:19 AM
> >>                *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
> >>                *Subject:* [AFMUG] BEAD
> >>                I’m surprised BEAD hasn’t run into problems because the
> >>                E stands for Equity and DEI is now banned.
> >>                But if they eliminate the E, would it just be BAD?
> >>                --                 AF mailing list
> >>                AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>                <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> >>            --             AF mailing list
> >>            AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>            <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> >>        --         AF mailing list
> >>        AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
> >>        af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> >>    --     AF mailing list
> >>    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com <http://
> >>    af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> >
> >
> > --
> > AF mailing list
> > AF@af.afmug.com
> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to