Did you see the movie Men In Black?  I think it’s like the aliens on the 
streets of New York City.  They’re right there in front of us, but we choose 
not to notice.

 

My first job after college at the big GTE Automatic Electric plant in 
Northlake, IL (as a test equipment design engineer) in 1972, we had a 
flamboyantly gay guy known as Gay Gilbert, and an old engineer named George who 
would invite young guys over to his house and suddenly be wearing just his 
boxer shorts.  It was a huge place so there were no doubt many more, but like 
the NYC aliens, they were invisible.

 

Who would have guessed at the time that Raymond Burr (reportedly one of the 
nicest people who ever lived) was gay.

 

But yeah, maybe energy drinks.  Or chemtrails, or vaccines.

 

I will admit to having my doubts about Bruce Jenner.  I feel like he was 
surrounded by all these women getting rich from their TV shows and product 
lines, and decided to join them.  But I’m probably influenced by the fact that 
he makes an unattractive woman.  While I admit that I think Chelsea Manning 
pulls it off.

 

Do you remember the Kinks song from the 70’s “Lola”?  L-O-L-A Lola.  A guy at 
my coop job was mortified because he took a girl home from a bar and she was 
not a girl.  That was probably 1970.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 7:34 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Cc: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

 

I blame energy drinks and internet porn.  We didn’t have these problems when we 
were limited to a purloined playboy.

Sent from my iPhone





On Dec 10, 2024, at 6:31 PM, Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com 
<mailto:khoh...@kwom.com> > wrote:



I’ve never understood why devoutly religious people have the biggest problem 
with gender dysphoric people.   Surely God made them that way, and God does not 
make mistakes.  That’s not me saying that, I have a loosey goosey relationship 
with organized religion.  But that’s how I imagine deeply religious people 
thinking.  Like maybe Sheldon’s mom?

 

If you’ve ever known a transgender person, the people who say it’s just men who 
decide to become women so they can go in the womens bathroom and assault women, 
that seems simplistic and mean spirited.  Or whenever I hear the term 
“lifestyle”, I know it’s talking points time.  Like people who choose the gay 
lifestyle.  Why do we never near about choosing the asshole lifestyle?  I’m not 
sure we can blame God for that one, it does seem like a lifestyle choice.

 

Not targeting any of these comments at you, BTW.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On Behalf 
Of ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 6:57 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

 

I apologize for starting this thread.  I was just wanting to put a bit of 
polish on my purposely provocative analogy.  I still think it a fun thought 
having teachers help kids come out and admit they are alcoholics.  I can see 
this being an SNL skit.  Maybe they will pay me lotsa money for writing this 
skit for them....  (see, you do not have to be trans to be delusional).  

 

Ken, I prefer the term “cross dresser”...  My kids also had friends that felt 
they were some how born wrong.  But with them the kids just became butch 
lesbians and are seemingly happy.  We run into them now and then.  

 

 

 

From: Jason McKemie 

Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 5:33 PM

To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:44 PM <ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> > 
wrote:

Lessee.... I was trying to be ridiculous, but I feel a bit of an impulse to 
provide some serious counterpoint here, this is bound to be a bad idea:

 

“Unfortunately they've repositioned themselves to be in favor of government 
control with: book bans, white washing history, controlling women's Healthcare, 
trying to ban same sex marriage, forcing religion (specifically Christianity) 
into public schools, threatening to imprison the media and people who speak out 
against them. “

 

Book Bans.  Yes, grade school kids do not need books describing gay anal rape 
etc.  Kids need to be allowed to grow up protected from the gritty truths of 
the world.  Book bans are necessary to prevent greater harm.

Book bans cover more than these sensationalist topics, reasonable people can 
agree not all books should be in a school library. 

 

White washing history.  History is there for the reading, more content and 
transparency than ever before.  What has been labeled “white washing” is in 
reality an attempt to bring balance to the narrative in public schools.  If you 
keep teaching “whitey is bad” then how do you ever expect people to be allowed 
to change?   The pendulum swings.

Critical race theory and some similar things are a bit out of control IMO.  
This definitely depends on the school you attend, they never taught this stuff 
at my school (I'm pretty sure they still don't teach it there).

 

Controlling women’s healthcare.  Call it what it really is, Abortion.    And 
for the majority of the world Abortion == Murder of an innocent child.  This 
will never change.  So don’t “whitewash” it by calling murder “health care”.  
Almost all sides understand there are medically necessary abortions and most 
are not arguing about those.  This is a red herring.  Moreover Trump said it is 
a states rights thing, he is right.  Read the constitution, anything not 
explicitly delineated or enumerated in the constitution is delegated to the 
control of the states.  Don’t like what your state is doing, work to change it 
there. 

The argument that it is a child carries a ton of religious baggage.  I would 
agree that it should be a state decision - many in the Republican party do not 
agree. There are also many other reproductive issues that fall into grey areas 
when abortion is outlawed.

 

Religion into schools:  Our whole legal system, actually the legal system of 
the entire western world is derived from Exodus chapter 20.  The 10 
commandments.  Putting the original codified law, the list governing behavior 
is not an injection of Christianity into the world of your precious little 
liberals kiddies.  It is a display of the origins of western civilization.  And 
the fact that supposedly believe in the “Rule of Law”  What better exhibit than 
to display the origin of  that.   

I think you can teach kids the facts about religion without indoctrination, 
again I think this varies based on school district. 

 

Who is imprisoning media personalities?  You mean like Biden having the FBI 
force Facebook and Twitter to silence and block their critics?    

 

 

 

From: Jason McKemie 

Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 4:19 PM

To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

 

Very well stated.   

 

I hope both political parties can get closer to center in the next few years 
(this is the only way our democracy can function properly), but I'm not holding 
my breath.  The current situation with the Republican party is only going to 
make things worse on both sides of the aisle.

 

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 4:26 PM Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com 
<mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> > wrote:

I think you're drinking the conspiracy kool-aid with this claim. I'm 33 and 
when I was in school, they needed permission to provide me something small like 
Tylenol. I have family members who are teachers and kids in our family from 
elementary to highschool. I'm also in Minnesota which has been blue for a long 
time. 

 

There is absolutely zero truth to kids being secretly helped to transition with 
meds or operations. The claim is absurd.

 

The claim that people support secret transition operations is also absurd. I'm 
socially liberal and fiscally conservative and this is not anything I would 
support. I doubt you'll find any sane adult that supports this. That means the 
democratic party absolutely does not support this either.

 

What I and most of the party does support is talking with kids who feel their 
gender doesn't match the way they were born. This means therapy, counseling, 
consultations with a doctor to talk through everything. Parents should be 
involved in the conversations if the child wants to do anything more than talk. 
Things like medications and such should not be provided without parental and 
doctor involvement. Again, there is ZERO evidence of schools providing any sort 
of medical treatment, prescriptions, or operations in secret to kids. Any such 
claim to the contrary is absurd. They don't have enough money for class 
supplies as it is.

 

What I do support is the school keeping the gender identity and sexuality 
private from parents IF the child feels the parents will be abusive to them if 
they come out. There's plenty of examples of strict or religious parents who 
would abuse or kick out a child if they came out as trans or LGBT. The privacy 
protection is something I'm onboard with. Anything more than counseling should 
not be allowed until parents are involved and a doctor agrees with any plans. 
Ideally, no physical operations will happen until they're 18 under any 
circumstances.

 

This is my opinion as a slightly left of center voter. Republicans should be in 
full support of these views as the self proclaimed "freedom party". 
Unfortunately they've repositioned themselves to be in favor of government 
control with: book bans, white washing history, controlling women's Healthcare, 
trying to ban same sex marriage, forcing religion (specifically Christianity) 
into public schools, threatening to imprison the media and people who speak out 
against them. Republicans are not about freedom anymore since Trump became 
popular. I hope once he's done with his second term that the party can return 
to normal.

 

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, 5:55 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com 
<mailto:khoh...@kwom.com> > wrote:

K-12 schools I am familiar with won't give out a Tylenol without parents 
permission, I'm not sure if they can apply a bandaid. So I'm skeptical about 
the meds part.

---- Original Message ----
From: ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com> 
Sent: 12/10/2024 1:28:27 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

OK, how can I strengthen the analogy?  I kinda want it to have a bit of a 
gotcha effect.  

I am purposely trying to be a bit vague as to practitioner and meds.  

 

 

From: Bill Prince 

Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 12:07 PM

To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Analogy

 

That's why context is so important. "Practitioner" is pretty subjective, as is 
"meds".  What if the meds were LSD, methamphetamine, psilocybin,  morphine? 
What if the practitioner were RFK Jr?

Analogy is weak.

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/10/2024 9:17 AM, ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com>  wrote:

Does this idea work:

Say the school observes/detects a certain trait in your kid.  The kid seemingly 
agrees with the people at the school.  They think that if they can get the kid 
treatment, the kid will be much happier and relaxed.

 

So they pursue some counseling for the kid and help the kid obtain some 
treatment meds from a practitioner.  

All without the knowledge of the parents.

Seemingly the kid is happier and more well adjusted.  They become gregarious 
and outgoing and find it easier to find friends.  

Nobody seems to tell the kid or be worried about the long term physical and 
mental effects.  

 

Some folks in this nation think this is totally OK.  

All for the kid right.

 

Now, a few details I left out:

 

The teacher thinks the kid might be an alcoholic.  There is some science that 
hints that alcholism is genetic.  The school thinks that it might be helpful 
for the kid to explore the world of alcohol.  They give the kid some books on 
mixology etc.  So they set up a kid bar with a bar tender to give them their 
meds during the day.  Spectacular results right.







  _____  


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


  _____  


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


  _____  


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to