The FAA Notice Criteria tool mentioned by Lewis is also more accurate than TOWAIR and we have seen instances where it will clear towers that TOWAIR failed. All we had to do was file the FAA Report data along with the TOWAIR data and the application was accepted.
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The FAA had a tool to determine if you have to file. > https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.jsp?action=showNoNoticeRequiredToolForm > > <https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.jsp?action=showNoNoticeRequiredToolForm> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 5:47 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com > <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote: > We have a tower next to a commercial building, I think it’s a 45 or 50 ft > probably Rohn 45G. It is near a smallish regional airport but pretty much 90 > degrees to the runway. We need to swap out the 5 GHz backhaul links on this > tower for licensed. > > > > The frequency coordinator is telling us that according to TOWAIR we need to > file for an ASR, I assume they mean not just with the FCC but with the FAA. > > > > By doing so, are we opening Pandora’s box, where they tell us not only is our > request denied, we have to take down the tower that has been there for 20 > years? Is this one of those things where we will really regret asking the > question and should have just kept quiet and suffered with the 5 GHz > interference? > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
