Many surveyors don't have any idea what that 1A should look like so they
are lost. The cost to do a 1A and 2C is the same and their accuracy exceeds
both of those requirements. If you need an example letter I produced and
have had successfully filed and completed the process with I can send you
one.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:20 PM Brian Webster <i...@wirelessmapping.com>
wrote:

> Tim is correct. TOWAIR will err on the conservative side so that if
> something is a close call, it will defer that decision to the FAA to do
> their precise study. A couple of key things to note. If you do have to
> file, always get a 1A qualified survey letter and send it with your
> application for study. This will allow the FAA to know that the vertical
> margin of error for the elevation information you filled in can only be 3
> feet. If you file a 2C survey letter they still assume a 20 foot vertical
> margin of error and they add that to your structure height. If you don’t
> supply either letter I think they add 50ft to your applied for height. Of
> other additional note, your state DOT and the local airport authority
> actually have more authority to require marking and lighting if they deem
> it necessary. When you file for an FAA determination, the FAA forwards your
> request to them for review as well. I had a tower application actually come
> back clear from the FAA but the Washington State DOT (aeronautical
> division) require that the tower be marked and lit. Most people don’t know
> that this can happen.
>
>
>
> If you want to study it quietly to know if you are possibly in violation,
> check with the folks at www.airspaceusa.com. They can run all the same
> studies the FAA will.
>
>
>
> Part of any FAA study is not only height clearance but they do study for
> RFI and possible radar blockages. RFI specifically as it might apply to any
> radio navigation systems. Technically if you add any transmitter to a tower
> that did not have those frequencies in the original application, you need
> to file again even if you don’t change the height so that they can do an
> RFI study again.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>
>
>
> *From:* AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Tim Hardy
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2020 11:59 AM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] TOWAIR and ASR for existing tower
>
>
>
> The FAA Notice Criteria tool mentioned by Lewis is also more accurate than
> TOWAIR and we have seen instances where it will clear towers that TOWAIR
> failed.  All we had to do was file the FAA Report data along with the
> TOWAIR data and the application was accepted.
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> The FAA had a tool to determine if you have to file.
>
>
> https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/gisTools/gisAction.jsp?action=showNoNoticeRequiredToolForm
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 5:47 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
> We have a tower next to a commercial building, I think it’s a 45 or 50 ft
> probably Rohn 45G.  It is near a smallish regional airport but pretty much
> 90 degrees to the runway.  We need to swap out the 5 GHz backhaul links on
> this tower for licensed.
>
>
>
> The frequency coordinator is telling us that according to TOWAIR we need
> to file for an ASR, I assume they mean not just with the FCC but with the
> FAA.
>
>
>
> By doing so, are we opening Pandora’s box, where they tell us not only is
> our request denied, we have to take down the tower that has been there for
> 20 years?  Is this one of those things where we will really regret asking
> the question and should have just kept quiet and suffered with the 5 GHz
> interference?
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to