Sounds like a couple bucks per month per CPE. The number started higher
and trended downwards.....I'm not sure if it's at the bottom yet.
I was disappointed about the per CPE thing, but it's not an insane cost.
On 1/27/2020 4:00 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Has there been any indication of what costs are going to be associated
with the SAS?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:20 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In CBRS you'll get higher EIRP, you'll no longer have the +2dbm Tx
limit
on mobile devices, and you'll have access to 3x the spectrum. Overall
you'd much rather operate under the CBRS rules
The main reason a person might prefer NN is they don't have to pay
for
the SAS.
In theory you could argue that a grandfathered NN license protects
you
from interference from a CBRS operator, but a person better make sure
they don't have any of those "bodies in the trunk" if they try to
call
the FCC for help with that. We'd also likely be stuck with old
equipment
in that case. If we use the advantages of the new rules then it's
hard
to argue that we should be protected by the old license, and if we're
using old Wimax gear with our old license then we'll be less
competitive
than someone with modern electronics, another 100mhz, and 8 or 10
more
db in the link budget.
In my opinion NN is dead already, regardless of what year a specific
license expires.
RIP NN
On 1/27/2020 11:52 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Apparently there was a window of time where new or renewed
licenses got expiration dates out to like 2025. See for example
WQVI696. I'm a little unclear on whether all Part 96 equipment
becomes illegal this April regardless of whether your NN license
expires. Ours was renewed in October 2018 and expires April 2020,
so it's moot unless we get an extension. But I know at least one
WISP that thinks they have lots of time because their license
doesn't expire until 2024.
>
> That's another bizarre feature of how the FCC has handled this.
A license acquired or renewed in 2018 expires in 2020, but one
acquired in 2015 runs the full 10 years to 2025? That's just
random. How can they not grant extensions if some licenses still
have 5 years to run?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of David Coudron
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 10:35 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105
>
> Yes, that is our understanding.
>
> David Coudron
> david.coud...@advantenon.com
<mailto:david.coud...@advantenon.com> | Mobile: 612-991-7474
>
> Advantenon, Inc.
> i...@advantenon.com <mailto:i...@advantenon.com> | 3500
Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 55447 |
www.advantenon.com <http://www.advantenon.com> | Phone:
800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 10:33 AM
> To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105
>
> On 1/27/20 7:20 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>> yep, and a self fulfilling failure on the part of the FCC.
The FCC
>> looked at the registered CPE and decided that WISP’s were not using
>> the band without ever considering how badly they fubared the entire
>> registration process.
>>
>> You WISP’s don’t need an extension, you didn’t use the band.
Uh, yeah.
>>
>
> Is the NN shutdown date still April 17, 2020?
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
