https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_aOHF6vjDT8mEiCTd-U6jHA
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 9:24 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > link? > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:40 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105 > > Alpha wireless is putting on a cbrs webinar and cambium will be there, > hopefully the Q&A is similar to the cambium even, it's worth signing up for > it > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 7:34 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > >> With the underlying license. >> >> There is something weird there though - a few WinnForum presentations >> have the GPWZ’s expiring by 2023. I’m guessing that is when the last of >> the licenses that have GWPZ’s expire even though there are NN licenses that >> last longer. I’m guessing none of those later expiration date licenses had >> registered locations in 2015. Hum… actually that makes sense - to have a >> license that expires in 2025 you would have had to get it on or around 2015 >> and would not have had registered locations at that time. >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> On Jan 27, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >> >> Mark, >> >> Do the GPWZ areas expire on April 17th 2020 also? Or they expire >> whenever the grandfathered NN license expires? >> >> -sean >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:01 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> > On Jan 27, 2020, at 2:20 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > <> >>> > >>> > In theory you could argue that a grandfathered NN license protects you >>> from interference from a CBRS operator, but a person better make sure they >>> don't have any of those "bodies in the trunk" if they try to call the FCC >>> for help with that. We'd also likely be stuck with old equipment in that >>> case. If we use the advantages of the new rules then it's hard to argue >>> that we should be protected by the old license, and if we're using old >>> Wimax gear with our old license then we'll be less competitive than someone >>> with modern electronics, another 100mhz, and 8 or 10 more db in the link >>> budget. >>> >>> >>> It’s not theory that you will be protected from CBRS interference if you >>> are in the grandfathered wireless protection zones (GWPZ’s). The SAS is >>> REQUIRED to honor the GPWZ and CAN NOT assign a CBSD a frequency between >>> 3650 and 3700Mhz. You do not need to contact the FCC if you are getting >>> interference from a CBSD - you need to contact the SAS the screwed up and >>> granted the request. >>> >>> Note this is a little problematic - you can’t get a 3650-3700 frequency >>> for a CBSD in a GWPZ even if it’s your own equipment. There is no current >>> mechanism in the SAS to say “It’s my GPWZ and I want to change the >>> equipment I’m using to SAS operation and use the same frequency. You >>> would need to unregister the existing 90z equipment and then hope that >>> someone else doesn’t get the channel. >>> >>> >>> Mark >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
