On Sun, August 15, 2010 21:44, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Given that both provide similar features, it's difficult to see why > Oracle would continue to invest in both. Given that ZFS is the more > mature product, it would seem more logical to transfer all the effort > to ZFS and leave btrfs to die.
Or have someone else (RH, IBM, Google) fund it. Other Linux users and vendors would probably prefer to have a file system which has a broader developer community: currently ZFS tends to be highly concentrated at Oracle. OEL may default to ZFS, but given the dozens and dozens of file systems available with Linux, I'm sure other distributions may select other ones. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
