On Mon, August 16, 2010 10:48, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Ray Van Dolson <rvandol...@esri.com> wrote: > >> > I absolutely guarantee Oracle can and likely already has >> > dual-licensed BTRFS. >> >> Well, Oracle obviously would want btrfs to stay as part of the Linux >> kernel rather than die a death of anonymity outside of it... >> >> As such, they'll need to continue to comply with GPLv2 requirements. > > No, there is definitely no need for Oracle to comply with the GPL as they > own the code.
Ray's point is, how long would BTRFS remain in the Linux kernel in that case? -- David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
