Hi, Eddy Petrișor a écrit : [...] > PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, keep the versions in order! > >> What we thought was a good solution, is to break from the >> major.minor.patch scheme and select the Ubuntu way (just an example), >> referring to the release date. > > The major.minor.patch scheme is really ok, imho.
So far, we have 2 strong oppositions (you/RCL), and probably 3 weak oks (myself, gentildemon, yekcim). I'm myself not strongly bent towards the ubuntu way. A typical case where the major.minor.patch scheme was kept is wine, and they did have trouble about getting nearer to the 1.0, which has defined goals. > And that would be a fsck-ed up situations (nobody likes epochs in > version numbers). I wouldn't be that sure, considering that, precisely, ubuntu did it, and that's no marginal example. But that's just rhetoric talk, nothing that really matters in the subject at hand. > I'd rather we use 0.8.0.rc1, or even drop the idea that 0.8.0 should I'd rather we don't. This would lead to such ridiculous schemes as mplayer's external versionning (mostly because they are not interested in versionning, but the whole world is). I'm OK with 0.8.1, ..., 0.8.50 (that means 13 years, let's hope not) if needed. > have proper networking and say that while we don't skip to 0.9.X we > won't consider networking code stable/final. Maybe not even that. Network is stable enough in my opinion. People are mentioning bugs they want to be fixed, but those bugs are not that disruptive to the gameplay. Even bigger annoyances can be skipped with just "known to be broken, avoid using it until we say it is fixed in a later version". Best regards, -- Kurosu _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
