Hi, after a discussion with gentildemon and yekcim (sorry it isn't public, but it's hard to note down things when you are face to face during a lunch), it seems to us that: 1) We should now prepare the final version 2) Switch to a less static release cycle, and rather use a 3 months schedule without version number (not sure about tagging some versions for the official distribution packages)
So far, I think I'm not misrepresenting the opinion of any of the 3 aforementioned team members. Concerning 1), I won't lay out such a neat program as Drayan did, but I would like to ask other developers' opinion in order to reach a consensus. I don't expect much opposition that a vote would change anything in the result. I'll be personnaly away starting 5th of March, so there won't be win32 and probably MacIntel binary package before April. But that shouldn't stop the process which I would lay out as this: - determine the remaining tasks to finish, and do incorporate them into trunk (max one week?) - tag this, warn translators and packagers to test the tarball (max 2 weeks?) and merge their work - incorporate any bugfix found in the meantime (max 1 week) in particular from packagers - release This means a release at worst by end of March. Opinions? Best regards, -- Kurosu _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
