Several persons, both through mail and IRC, expressed a concern. This mail tries to address it.
Kurosu a écrit : > 2) Switch to a less static release cycle, and rather use a 3 months > schedule without version number (not sure about tagging some versions > for the official distribution packages) The question that arose was about the versionning. Of course versions would be tagged, and what is left to determine is the numbering. What we thought was a good solution, is to break from the major.minor.patch scheme and select the Ubuntu way (just an example), referring to the release date. This would be, for instance, 8.06 for the version after this one. This is a neat coincidence that it somewhat match the next version number (0.8, so maybe 0.8.06 ?). This would not disrupt too much the numbering for distros. Best regards, -- Kurosu _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
