Hi Massimo -- Comments below...
On May 30, 10:58 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > I appreciate the criticism. I agree the wiki has lagged behind. Is > this really because of the technology behind it? Yes. It is not a wiki until you have urls that reflect the page title, easy linking from one wiki entry to another, etc. These are fundamental wiki features and you won't get any significant content until people can use it easily. A wiki comes with some high expectation of its features, and ours does not measure up. > I cannot do it now because we need to rewrite the DAL first and clean > the Auth interface. You have made my point for me. There will ALWAYS be technical issues that need improvement. That is axiomatic for any living open-source project. What we lack now is an infrastructure and commitment to documenting the software in step with its changes. Can you show me a truly successful, long-term OS project that does not make documentation a top priority? > > The number of web2py is growing and growing fast. Your metric is flawed. All you can say for certain is that a growing number of people were interested in web2py at some point in time. You cannot tell how many have left in frustration and now use other platforms. Warm regards, Joe Barnhart --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
