Joe, going back to your concerns. I think some are founded and some are not.
It is not true that web2py is failing. It is going very well from my data. It is true we can do better. It true that documentation is one of the areas it can improve. I am not sure whether you blame this on the technology we use for implementing the wiki or the fact that I am not contributing to the wiki. I am not really concerned about this since I am writing the second edition of the book and the current version is not really outdated. I think our documentation is not as good as Django's but it is better than Pylons. Yes, the community could do more to outreach. That is not happening and that is why people outside perceive this incorrectly as a one man show. Has anybody else here every wrote a blog entry web2py and posted a link on reddit or digg? If so I am not aware of it and this is a problem. I do encourage people who are contributors or who are users to talk more about web2py. Anyway, what do you suggest we do? What can you do? Massimo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
