i see. i think it might be a missed opportunity as such application could be very successful and would greatly popularize the platform.
imagine having web2py wiki being able to import MW database automatically. lot's of people would give it a try as very many are frustrated by the clunkiness of MW design. even if you have settled on reST, I hope somebody else will consider writing MW successor in web2py. lastly - IMO - the future of wiki lies in wysiwyg tools, less in improving markup. this is because the key in wiki success is increasing ratio of writers/ readers and you'll get more writers if it's easy and more fun to add content. Evgeny. On May 28, 12:07 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > There was a long discussion about this and we settled on reST. > > Massimo > > On May 28, 1:46 pm, Evgeny <evgeny.fad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > does web2py wiki support mediawiki markup? > > > would be great - MW is probably most widely used because of the > > popularity of wikipedia. > > > I would gladly migrate to an engine written in python and would > > contribute some code with time. > > > Best, > > Evgeny. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
