It is actually very easy to change it (<10 lines of code I guess) and the source is public. perhaps next verion may have a configuration parameter
On May 28, 3:23 pm, Evgeny <evgeny.fad...@gmail.com> wrote: > i see. i think it might be a missed opportunity as such application > could be very successful > and would greatly popularize the platform. > > imagine having web2py wiki being able to import MW database > automatically. > > lot's of people would give it a try as very many are frustrated by the > clunkiness of MW design. > > even if you have settled on reST, I hope somebody else will consider > writing MW successor > in web2py. > > lastly - IMO - the future of wiki lies in wysiwyg tools, less in > improving markup. > this is because the key in wiki success is increasing ratio of writers/ > readers and you'll get more > writers if it's easy and more fun to add content. > > Evgeny. > > On May 28, 12:07 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > There was a long discussion about this and we settled on reST. > > > Massimo > > > On May 28, 1:46 pm, Evgeny <evgeny.fad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > does web2py wiki support mediawiki markup? > > > > would be great - MW is probably most widely used because of the > > > popularity of wikipedia. > > > > I would gladly migrate to an engine written in python and would > > > contribute some code with time. > > > > Best, > > > Evgeny. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
