I am not sure what point is discussed in here. What's the advantage of including it in web2py if you can simply drop it in the modules folder?
On Mar 1, 9:52 pm, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're right. I don't see this for production. But it would be nice > to distribute a "fully" self contained trial version of an app for > non-python-literate, non-developer, potential app users, to take for > a spin on localhost. At any rate, it's something I'll explore on my > own. > > On Mar 1, 2:43 pm, Jason Brower <encomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just used pil today, and I don't think it's a good idea. I think if > > we keep it as small as possible we can really make a powerful system. > > A plugin system would be nice for non python OS's for example mac and > > windows, it would be easier to use the import tools in python to get > > PIL, for example. But in linux distros almost always have packages to > > handle this stuff. You may get an uproar if you skipped the distros way > > of installing new python libraries. > > Regards, > > Jason > > > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 12:30 -0800, Greg Fuller wrote: > > > True enough. Could probably do a plugin which would test for the > > > environment, import as, etc. Then the work could still be shared > > > without loading down the base. > > > > But darnit, I was hoping all 842 members would raise their voices in > > > unison for this idea. :) > > > > --greg-- > > > > On Mar 1, 2:15 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > since YOU can package your distribution for a target environment (and > > > > are > > > > free to include what additional libraries your application for your > > > > client > > > > needs), it seems to me no reason to load down a base distribution with > > > > other > > > > than what is always used, and base development support. > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I've noticed a good number, and probably a sizable percentage, of > > > > > web2py applications are using PIL. Same with Django. I'm not sure > > > > > that's true of NumPy or any other external app. But I do see the > > > > > point. > > > > > > On Mar 1, 1:54 pm, Markus Gritsch <m.grit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > IMHO, I would be a great benefit to web2py to have PIL included > > > > > > > if it > > > > > > > could be done with good success rate - not even 100%. Maybe it > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > initially be included as an "experimental" capability or > > > > > > > something. > > > > > > > Massimo is right with his arguments agaimst inclusion. The next > > > > > > would > > > > > > come and would like to have NumPy or some other big Package > > > > > > included. > > > > > > Let's keep the binary package reasonably small, and not create a > > > > > > monster which would be hard to maintain. > > > > > > > Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
