On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > IMHO, I would be a great benefit to web2py to have PIL included if it > could be done with good success rate - not even 100%. Maybe it could > initially be included as an "experimental" capability or something.
Massimo is right with his arguments agaimst inclusion. The next would come and would like to have NumPy or some other big Package included. Let's keep the binary package reasonably small, and not create a monster which would be hard to maintain. Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
