Web2Py is fantastic for packaging your application into a trial version that can just be downloaded, unpacked and run - without dependencies. No other framework I'm aware of can do this.
The one snag is PIL. The applications I write usually require an imaging library. I know that PIL is not pure python, and requires a compile step because of the C code. But I have also been able to find binary distributions for the platforms I've worked on - OS/X and Windows. I would think there is also a Linux binary distribution available. But, no problem there -- PIL has been available on the Linux platforms I've deployed on (like webfaction). If I'm reading the PIL license correctly on pythonware.com, it can be distributed. So, are there any technical difficulties or licensing reasons why a PIL binaries should not be included in a distribution? Thanks, --greg-- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
