I think what we really need is package easy_install with web2py.

If your app needs PIL, it will check if it is there else call
easy_install. It would work with every python module.

If anybody could send me a patch or an example to make this work
programmatically I will include it.

Massimo

On Mar 1, 3:08 pm, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It may benefit from a little glue code since there are different
> binaries for different platforms.  To check for environment, import
> as, or try/except, etc.  But maybe not - I could be making it more
> complex than it needs to be.  I do that sometimes.
>
> On Mar 1, 2:58 pm, Pedro <pedro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what point is discussed in here. What's the advantage of
> > including it in web2py if you can simply drop it in the modules
> > folder?
>
> > On Mar 1, 9:52 pm, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > You're right.  I don't see this for production.  But it would be nice
> > > to distribute a  "fully" self contained trial version of an app for
> > > non-python-literate, non-developer,  potential app users,  to take for
> > > a spin on localhost. At any rate, it's something I'll explore on my
> > > own.
>
> > > On Mar 1, 2:43 pm, Jason Brower <encomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I just used pil today, and I don't think it's a good idea.  I think if
> > > > we keep it as small as possible we can really make a powerful system.
> > > > A plugin system would be nice for non python OS's for example mac and
> > > > windows, it would be easier to use the import tools in python to get
> > > > PIL, for example.  But in linux distros almost always have packages to
> > > > handle this stuff.  You may get an uproar if you skipped the distros way
> > > > of installing new python libraries.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jason
>
> > > > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 12:30 -0800, Greg Fuller wrote:
> > > > > True enough.  Could probably do a plugin which would  test for the
> > > > > environment, import as, etc.  Then the work could still be shared
> > > > > without loading down the base.
>
> > > > > But darnit, I was hoping all 842 members would raise their voices in
> > > > > unison for this idea.  :)
>
> > > > > --greg--
>
> > > > > On Mar 1, 2:15 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > since YOU can package your distribution for a target environment 
> > > > > > (and are
> > > > > > free to include what additional libraries your application for your 
> > > > > > client
> > > > > > needs), it seems to me no reason to load down a base distribution 
> > > > > > with other
> > > > > > than what is always used, and base development support.
>
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Greg Fuller <gregf...@gmail.com> 
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I've noticed a good number, and probably a sizable percentage,  of
> > > > > > > web2py applications are using PIL.  Same with Django.   I'm not 
> > > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > that's true of NumPy or any other external app.  But I do see the
> > > > > > > point.
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 1, 1:54 pm, Markus Gritsch <m.grit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Greg Fuller 
> > > > > > > > <gregf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > IMHO, I would be a great benefit to web2py to have PIL 
> > > > > > > > > included if it
> > > > > > > > > could be done with good success rate - not even 100%.  Maybe 
> > > > > > > > > it could
> > > > > > > > > initially be included as an "experimental" capability or 
> > > > > > > > > something.
>
> > > > > > > > Massimo is right with his arguments agaimst inclusion.  The 
> > > > > > > > next would
> > > > > > > > come and would like to have NumPy or some other big Package 
> > > > > > > > included.
> > > > > > > > Let's keep the binary package reasonably small, and not create a
> > > > > > > > monster which would be hard to maintain.
>
> > > > > > > > Markus
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to