+1 on a centralized place for documentation. I'm undecided on if we should use trac or web2py for this though. - Trac is a great tool and it's already implemented which are pluses for it, but using the framework shows a lot of confidence in it. - Doesn't Django use Trac?
Paul On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Feb 25, 1:38 am, Joe Barnhart <joe.barnh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> One problem is that our docs are too fragmented at present. Perhaps >> we should undertake a central wiki and bring all of the other content >> into it. > > +1 > >> It could be based on web2py or not, but it should have the standard >> wiki revision control. I find the current wiki less useful without >> it. > > Agreed. > For me, I find the best integrated tool for Wiki/BugTracker/SCM is > Trac & you get free project management functionality as well. This > provides the lowest maintenance overheads ways of running a dev > project. > > http://www.klambauer.info/pms.pdf > "Trac is probably the best tool for managing software projects of any > size. -> Highly Recommended!" > My practical experience backs this up... > > It can also run on the same environment as Web2Py (Apache/WSGI). > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
