+1 on that one. Launchpad does a great job right now. Any basic wiki should do the trick. But I think the most familiar one we could use would be mediawiki. I mean, who doesn't know that one. Regards, Jason Brower
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 08:51 -0800, mdipierro wrote: > I am not sure Shinx is the same as track. > > I think there are different issues... > trac does lot of stuff but we already have launchpad. I think we only > need a wiki. > > I do not think trac is our tool. > > is there any wiki out there that can automatically generate a TEX + > PDF document? > > massimo > > > On Feb 25, 10:10 am, ctalley <ctal...@caci.com> wrote: > > I'm sure all the tools mentioned (Trac, web2py, Sphinx) have certain > > advantages and disadvantages, and I don't claim to know what they all > > are, but a strong argument for Sphinx is that it is what > > docs.python.org uses. Of course the downside might be the learning > > curve if nobody's ever used it. > > > > On Feb 25, 10:00 am, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 25, 2:51 pm, Paul Eden <benchl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > - Doesn't Django useTrac? > > > > > Yes:http://code.djangoproject.com/ > > > > > > using the framework shows a lot of confidence in it > > > > > If the Wiki could have versioning added, that would take away the > > > major constraint to it. > > > Not sure how hard that is... > > > > > F > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
