I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building - it worked fine. I didn't check federation.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to start the > server? > > Ali > On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing folder. > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I see, what was the issue with federation? > > > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > >> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation enabled. > > >> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build correctly). > > >> > > >> Checked: > > >> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs > > >> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests > > >> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, build.properties > > >> - Started server without federation using file backends. Tested wave > > >> creation, simple editing, etc. > > >> - Artifact naming seems good. > > >> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing > > >> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the whack.jar file > > >> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder how it worked > > >> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error here, or > > >> do you get something different when you build from the artifact in a > > >> clean folder? > > >> > > >> Ali > > >> > > >> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and runs. > > >> > On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one seems to > > >> >> have responded. > > >> >> > > >> >> I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so hope to get > > to > > >> >> this this evening... > > >> >> > > >> >> Ali > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > RC9 is now available for review. > > >> >> > Artifacts can be found here: > > >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 > > >> >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') > > >> >> > This time I included only source artifacts. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating > > >> >> > > > >> >> > This is taken from branch > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Reminder on what included previous release candidates: > > >> >> > RC7 and RC8 included: > > >> >> > - Release related fixes. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > RC6 included: > > >> >> > - Bug Fixes > > >> >> > > > >> >> > RC5 included: > > >> >> > - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for deltas > > >> >> migration > > >> >> > from file to mongo based store. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > - Added client/server profiling. > > >> >> > - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. > > >> >> > - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. > > >> >> > - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and added > GWT > > >> >> > superdev mode. > > >> >> > - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. > > >> >> > - Added JDK 7 compatibility. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > RC4 included: > > >> >> > - More licensing fixes > > >> >> > - Federation works > > >> >> > - New and updated translations > > >> >> > - And more... > > >> >> > > > >> >> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, > and > > a > > >> list > > >> >> > of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution url, as > > >> well as > > >> >> > being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Action Required: > > >> >> > Test the release and make it works on your environment - at least > > >> >> standard > > >> >> > configurations. Please go over the source files and make sure > they > > >> don't > > >> >> > contain anything that cannot be released under Apache Wave due to > > >> legal > > >> >> > issues. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May 2015. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > [ ] +1 Release it! > > >> >> > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > >> >> > [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... > > >> >> > [ ] -1 Definitely not because... > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Thanks > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >
