No offense taken. I actually prefer it when people call out weak points in anything that I might be entertaining. It keeps one honest. I hope Jones continues to object. Also, I don't imagine anyone has hit the nail on the head yet.
Eric On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:19 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Eric, It is a good thing for you to suggest alternate possibilities for > all of us to consider. Most, if not all of the current ideas will turn out > to be wrong for one reason or the other. Jones has given us several good > reasons to assume that there can be essentially no gammas released without > being dangerous. I believe that this is most likely the situation. My > search for a mechanism that releases the binding energy while withholding > the gamma ray emissions continues. > > I suspect that everyone in the group has their own pet hypothesis and many > like you and I are attempting to keep an open mind that is receptive to > additional possibilities. Do not become defensive when someone points out > good reasons to suspect that a concept might have problems. One day we > will understand how LENR operates and your ideas might prove very valuable > on that path to knowledge. > > Dave >
