Isn’t this a case of missing the forest, for the trees? The problem with this invention of “gamma suppression” for which there is no proof in any field - is not whether it might happen in principle, or some of the time. It probably could happen in a carefully prepared experiment with a narrow spectrum, for part of the time. The insurmountable problem is the statistical problem that gamma suppression must happen 100% of the time in practice, or else it is not just observable, but deadly.
The only realistic alternative is that there are no gammas.
It might be possible to rationalize that there could be a burst of gammas on
startup, but thereafter, the reaction itself produces none. If gammas are
produced at all, the nature of the radiation is that some always get through
– even through thick lead shielding.
IOW - if there were any produced at all, some will always get through.
From: David Roberson
Your graphs clearly demonstrate the double balanced mix of a
carrier signal and a modulation signal
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Walker
Here are two graphs, before and after heterodyning of the
carrier signal (x-rays) with the beat signal (a gamma; hopefully I'm doing
the calculation correctly):
* Before: http://bit.ly/LCMs7E
* After: http://bit.ly/N5ybMy
You may need Google Chrome to see the graphs -- I'm not
sure. The second signal still has a lot of stuff going on, but it's also
got some much more macro-scale features now as well. Perhaps it is now able
to interact with the environment of the cavity. Other nonlinear effects may
take over from here, such as Raman amplification, where the "signal" photon,
in the x-ray range in this case, is amplified by another signal photon in
the same range produced by a nonlinear interaction with the "pump" photon,
in this instance the gamma.
All of this is obviously highly speculative. But it does
not seem to be completely crazy.
Eric
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
