> On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 22:36, Dave Warren wrote: > > > Funnily enough, MS wrote Terminal Server a few years later (NT4 multiuser) > > > but AFAIK their protocol (RDP?) is too fat to squeeze down at 56k line. I > > think > > > that XP workstation also uses RDP so I wonder if they've improved it. > > > > >From personal experience, I'd rather run NT4/W2K's implementation of RDP > > then VNC over a 9600bps link. I've done both.
Not to be too off topic but the RDP 5.0 in win2k isn't that bad over a 56k link. RDP 4.0 was usable over a 56k link if you needed to use it. I have had problems with VNC locking up in VB applications that do a lot of refreshes but don't have any problems witn RDP. Besides that TightVNC has worked great over slow links for administering workstations. -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
