I'd go with tightVNC, It's noticibly faster, and just as stable, It all comes from the same source code.
Ben Hunsberger wrote: > Hi, I'm new to the VNC scene. I just downloaded "regular" VNC 3.3.3r9. > However, I've now noticed this discussion regarding TightVNC > > What has been the experiences of people who have used both products? > > What is the relative stability issues? > > Should I even consider VNC 3.3.3.r9 when TightVNC is reportable faster? > > In short I'd like to pick the appropriate product first. > Performance over 56/64k is important > Stability on windows only platforms: Win2000, WinNT 4.0, win9x. > Free is of course a major benefit :). > > Are these two separate products now, with 2 separate development paths > or does TightVNC take regular and integrate their "tight" protocal? > > Long list of questions, > > Thanks in advance > > Ben Hunsberger > Banks Corporation > Elkhart In. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: > 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY > See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html > --------------------------------------------------------------------- [demime 0.97b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of justin.bennett.vcf] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
