Hi, I'm new to the VNC scene. I just downloaded "regular" VNC 3.3.3r9. However, I've now noticed this discussion regarding TightVNC
What has been the experiences of people who have used both products? What is the relative stability issues? Should I even consider VNC 3.3.3.r9 when TightVNC is reportable faster? In short I'd like to pick the appropriate product first. Performance over 56/64k is important Stability on windows only platforms: Win2000, WinNT 4.0, win9x. Free is of course a major benefit :). Are these two separate products now, with 2 separate development paths or does TightVNC take regular and integrate their "tight" protocal? Long list of questions, Thanks in advance Ben Hunsberger Banks Corporation Elkhart In. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
