Id not say 'ego', more like differences in opinion on VNC's direction in life..
Each flavor has its purpose, combining them woiuld quickly lead to bloat and veer far away from its orginal purpose: a *simple*, small, multi-platform remote control. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jerry McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:11 PM >Subject: Re: tight encoding in realvnc? > On Saturday 18 January 2003 12:10 pm, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote: > > > Hi, Fabian, > > > > I posted a while back to both forums asking > > about the likelihood of consolidating the two, > > RealVNC and TightVNC. It only makes sense, > > more so than to have RealVNC with tight > > encoding, and TightVNC as a separate project. > > There wasn't much response (none, actually) > > Who knows, maybe there are factors besides > > just technical feasibility. > > > > > Yeah... I think it's called, ego. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
