On 08/05/2014 06:06 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/5/2014 11:50 AM, RobertGrimes wrote:
I don't know if this is fair to ask, but would you (or anyone) care to
see
if the message I am posting should be rated higher than 1.9? I
appologize if
this is not appropriate.
The message is at http://pastebin.com/UZeDtLWZ
The debug log from spamd is at http://pastebin.com/6FERLq5C
That message doesn't contain much that the general SA rules will match.
This type of message is a good candidate for Bayes once you get the
training sorted out. If the headers were there, then there might be
something. The debug log is not particularly useful. The main thing we
need to see in this case is the headers that were added to the message.
The message is missing most of the headers. You need to figure out how
to get the message with all of the headers intact for the best test. One
way to do it is to get the message directly from the server. If the
server is using the Maildir format, then each message is its own file
and you just have to copy the right one. You can also get it from
Outlook. If you view the message and then poke around in the menus,
there should be an option to "View Headers". This will actually show
you the full text of the message along with the headers. This is what
you need to be testing with and showing us. (Caveat: The last version
of Outlook I dealt with was 2000, so it may be a bit different now.
Hopefully the option is still there somewhere.)
AND msg only shows part of the body...
get the full pristine msg from the hmailserver's Maildir and test
against that.
