Bowie Bailey wrote
> On 8/4/2014 4:02 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
>>
>> I just got a new message that scored 0 - here are the headers put in:
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0
>> tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
>> URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
>
> You are being blocked by URIBL. This is probably due to querying a
> public DNS server. You should run a caching nameserver on your local
> machine for SA to use for blacklist lookups.
>
>> I saved the messaged from outlook and ran spamc and got a score of 7.3
>> with
>> the headers of:
>>
>> Received: from localhost by server
>> with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
>> Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:56:46 -0700
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-Spam-Level: *******
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.3 required=5.0
>> tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,
>>
>> MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,
>> NO_RELAYS,NULL_IN_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,URI_HEX autolearn=no
>> autolearn_force=no
>> version=3.4.0
>
> Almost all of this is due to header errors. There appears to be
> something wrong with the message you saved. This could be due to
> Outlook. Put a copy of the message in www.pastebin.com so we can look
> at it.
>
>> both should be running under the same administrator account. Obviously
>> something is amiss but where do I start looking. I believe the high score
>> as
>> the message surely is spam.
>
> The high score would be preferable for a spam, but it this case, I think
> the score you are seeing is mostly due to your saved test message being
> formatted incorrectly.
>
> --
> Bowie
You may have hit the nail on the head. I made a bad assumption the format
was what I needed. WRONG!
I found the original file that hMailServer worked with. There are the SA
headers but now the score is a bit more accurate.
Running spamc yields headers:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
which is the same as the score hMailServer via SA got. That makes me feel a
lot better that I can reproduce the score manually.
Of course, now the bigger question. What do I do to get this obvious spam
message to be spam.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/New-at-SpamAssassin-how-to-not-get-headers-tp110712p110726.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
