Martin Gregorie-2 wrote > On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 13:15 -0700, RobertGrimes wrote: >> I am not sure the reference to Linux as I am only using windows. I have >> not >> modified any pathnames so I don't see how the backslash vs forwardslash >> is >> relevant unless it is buried somewhere. >> > I'm not talking about backslash vs slash: if I was I'd have said so. > > What I am talking about is bare file names and those that start with a > directory that is NOT preceeded by a drive ID or a slash, i.e. > dirname/filename. These are known as relative pathnames because their > exact meaning depends on the reference point in the filing system that > they are used from. This is quite different to names that start with a > slash or drive letter, e.g. /dirname/filename or C:/dirname/filename. > The latter are known as absolute pathnames because their meaning is > independent of the user's or program's reference point in the filing > system. > > Because relative pathnames are relative to the environment that the > program is running in, their meaning can be affected by OS differences, > while absolute pathnames are unaffected as long as they are accepted by > the OS. You aren't getting complaints about invalid filenames, so its > possible that some relative pathname is getting misunderstood. > >> I am running the spamc command line >> in the exact same directory as where the spamd runs. >> > Is that the directory that both programs are installed in or some other > directory? > > Are both programs installed in the same directory? > What is its name? > What is the name pased to spamc and spamd to tell them where to find the > spamassassin configuration? > >> They both are running >> under the same user account so permissions should be equal. >> > OK, so its not a permissions problem. > >> I have been running SA for several months and get at least 100 spams a >> day. >> Learning should be in force. >> > But have you had enough hams yet? They are also necessary before Bayes > will work and, in some environments can be considerably thinner on the > ground (I had a spam:ham ration of 80:20 until my ISP turned on > greylisting, when overnight it switched to 20:80. > > > Martin
Both spamc and hMailServer SA service are running in the same directory where the binaries for SA are. I am not sure the significance of the directory name. As I stated both use the same parameters which is only -l therefore SA uses default config file locations for both. I have had serveral hundred hams. Wouldn't that be enough? -- View this message in context: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/New-at-SpamAssassin-how-to-not-get-headers-tp110712p110732.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
