On 8/4/2014 4:02 PM, RobertGrimes wrote:
I just got a new message that scored 0 - here are the headers put in: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
You are being blocked by URIBL. This is probably due to querying a public DNS server. You should run a caching nameserver on your local machine for SA to use for blacklist lookups.
I saved the messaged from outlook and ran spamc and got a score of 7.3 with the headers of: Received: from localhost by server with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:56:46 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on server X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ******* X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.3 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,MISSING_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,NULL_IN_BODY,URIBL_BLOCKED,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Almost all of this is due to header errors. There appears to be something wrong with the message you saved. This could be due to Outlook. Put a copy of the message in www.pastebin.com so we can look at it.
both should be running under the same administrator account. Obviously something is amiss but where do I start looking. I believe the high score as the message surely is spam.
The high score would be preferable for a spam, but it this case, I think the score you are seeing is mostly due to your saved test message being formatted incorrectly.
-- Bowie
