On May 6, 2013, at 9:08 AM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
If there is a working abuse@ address that *isn't being ignored*, they're
compliant.
On 06.05.13 09:55, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
heh, i don't think 'don't ignore' is part of the RFC, but yeah.
well, if it clearly is not working, it's not compliant. if it's visibly
ignored, trashed, dropped, it violates the RFC
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #98652: Operation completed successfully.
